Math Accessibility: Switch Back To MathJax? #50
Labels
No Label
accessibility
beginner-friendly
bug
code
critical
cygwin
documentation
duplicate
enhancement
error reporting
external
help wanted
infrastructure
invalid
investigate
language-spec
logs
lti
mac
maybe
qtype:bigbox
qtype:checkoff
qtype:expression
qtype:fileupload
qtype:multiexpression
qtype:multiplechoice
qtype:number
qtype:pythoncode
qtype:pythonic
qtype:pythonliteral
qtype:richtext
qtype:smallbox
question
question types
sandbox
security
ui/ux
wontfix
wsl
No Milestone
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference: catsoop/catsoop#50
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
There is no content yet.
Delete Branch "%!s(<nil>)"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may exist for a short time before cleaning up, in most cases it CANNOT be undone. Continue?
After my conversations surrounding #49, I'm wondering whether it makes sense to switch back to MathJax for math rendering. MathJax 3 seems to be just as fast as KaTeX, it supports more things, and, most importantly, it seems to work much better with screen readers (I don't have any personal experience, so just going based on what I see online).
This is happening as part of #57, with good results from testing so far. Closing this issue.